Intelligent Design, or Someone Else’s B Material
This is probably someone else’s B material; whatever…
The problem with intelligent design is that it’s not really intelligent. Any omnipotent would have to be a complete idiot to have designed a lot of what exists in reality. I’m sure you just thought of one example. What was it?
For me it’s kangaroos. Ima create a creature whose only form of travel is hopping and its children sleep in an exposed pouch on its belly. There is nothing intelligent to the design of kangaroos.
I’m sorry. I must take exception.
Traditional Media Naivete
Excerpt from MTV News article, Bryan Singer’s ‘H+ The Digital Series’ Shuts Down Hardwired Humans
“An advantage of placing “H+” on YouTube is the audience’s ability to control their viewing experience and share it with others. Episodes can be watched in scripted order or chronological order, or based on storyline, character or location.
“People are going to be able to create their own curated playlists, out of as many or as few episodes as they want,” said Cabrera. “What we’re hoping that creates is a new form of what I like to call social distribution, where the actual audiences themselves become a part of the storytelling process.”
…
This shows some naivete regarding the platform, either on the part of John Cabrera (H+) or Tami Katzoff (MTV News) or both.
What Cabrera likes to call “social distribution” (i.e. user-generated playlists) has existed on YouTube for several years. YT audiences have been curating their own programming blocks for that long. It is only a new form of distribution if you’ve never administered a YT channel before.
The challenge is that the vast majority of Web audiences still retain a traditional media mindset. They either don’t know that they are their own Brandon Tartikoff and/or they simply don’t want to be their own Brandon Tartikoff. Traditional media audiences have been spoon-fed their A/V content for 117 years and that form of delivery has become habitual.
Many people use TV and Cinema as devices for relaxation and escapism; it allows them to turn off their own analytical thoughts and consume someone else’s thoughts for a little while. Our brains are wired for consumption OR analysis, not both at the same time. As soon as you start analyzing content, you’re no longer engaged in its consumption. Your brain contextualizes every frame differently.
For some, that activity spoils (for lack of a better word) future consumption, which is why many content creators cannot consume content without recognizing the content elements. It’s very rare that I will watch a movie without thinking, “ok there’s the inciting incident”, “there’s the departure from the familiar world, we’re now in Act 2”, etc, etc. That’s the same analytical part of the brain that is used to make playlists on YouTube in the way that Cabrera is describing.
The majority of user-generated playlists on YouTube are really no different than that user’s Favorites playlist. The videos are unrelated other than the fact that this user has bunched them all together and called the playlist “Funny Vids”. There’s very little thought – if any – given to narrative flow or thematic relationships.
I suspect Cabrera is going to be unsatisfied with the results of his “new form” of distribution. If H+’s producers were smart, they’d just take the extra few hours and create these theme-based H+ playlists themselves. Hoping audiences will do it is just plain naive and lazy. Audiences need to be retrained and rewired for Cabrera’s goal to be fulfilled.
Election results
Just a reminder to everyone on the planet that in any sort of election, the candidate you complain about on Facebook or in comment sections of blogs is invariably going to be the candidate who will win the election.
So pick your complaints wisely.
Demand more of the person that you’re going to vote for rather than the person you’re not going to vote for.
On the Aurora Massacre
A comment on a Facebook post I read:
“People just need to stop crapping their pants and running for the gun shop every time something bad happens and start thinking about why it happens here more than in any other first world country.”
It is certainly something endemic to North American society.
1 possibility…
Perhaps because “dog eat dog” is a mantra that too many follow? A cornerstone of America’s social contract is “The American Dream” – that anybody, no matter the social strata from which they originated, can become prosperous in whatever form is meaningful to them. And that places an exorbitant amount of emphasis on the results of being an individual in society (Prosperity!) rather than than process of simply being an individual in society (Community!).
It’s a carrot at the end of a stick that every American and immigrant to America is aware of. And it places individuals in direct competition with each other within society itself – for power, for money, for prestige, for attention. It creates winners; but you can’t have winners without losers.
The American Dream is merely a game show, and there are no parting gifts.