<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: And All The Ayatollah&#8217;s Men Couldn&#8217;t Put Him Back Together Again</title>
	<atom:link href="http://sifr4.com/blog/2009/06/20/and-all-the-ayatollahs-men-couldnt-put-him-back-together-again/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://sifr4.com/blog/2009/06/20/and-all-the-ayatollahs-men-couldnt-put-him-back-together-again/</link>
	<description>warm words from a hot head</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Sep 2010 16:37:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: zx</title>
		<link>http://sifr4.com/blog/2009/06/20/and-all-the-ayatollahs-men-couldnt-put-him-back-together-again/comment-page-1/#comment-65</link>
		<dc:creator>zx</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2009 16:40:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sifr4.com/blog/?p=174#comment-65</guid>
		<description>Mr. Sifr4 =

you are the one that said:

&quot;All that’s left to happen now is for several thousand individuals to be murdered so that these fundamentalist numb skulls can express their fear with bullets&quot;

I apologize for saying &#039;thousands and thousands&#039; instead of &#039;several thousands&#039; - my mistake.

Not sure of your point anymore though.  You seem to love your own words so much as to lose the reader in your arguments.  Sorry.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mr. Sifr4 =</p>
<p>you are the one that said:</p>
<p>&#8220;All that’s left to happen now is for several thousand individuals to be murdered so that these fundamentalist numb skulls can express their fear with bullets&#8221;</p>
<p>I apologize for saying &#8216;thousands and thousands&#8217; instead of &#8216;several thousands&#8217; &#8211; my mistake.</p>
<p>Not sure of your point anymore though.  You seem to love your own words so much as to lose the reader in your arguments.  Sorry.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sifr4</title>
		<link>http://sifr4.com/blog/2009/06/20/and-all-the-ayatollahs-men-couldnt-put-him-back-together-again/comment-page-1/#comment-64</link>
		<dc:creator>sifr4</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2009 18:12:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sifr4.com/blog/?p=174#comment-64</guid>
		<description>&quot;Thousands and thousands&quot; this commenter says. Well let&#039;s do the math on that. &quot;Thousands&quot; is plural so that equals at least 2 thousand. So by this commenter&#039;s account, at least 4 thousand people have died, specifically &quot;in the streets&quot;. None of them are dying indoors like civilized cunts. And I guess the only way for the commenter to actually know this as a fact is that he or she is there, in the streets of Tehran, counting people as they die. How else could the commenter possible know these &#039;facts&#039;?

Of course they do not know these facts. They believe these facts. Which makes them opinions, not facts. Further shown by the commenter providing absolutely no reference for the statement that he or she represents as fact.  They&#039;ve decided themselves that there must be &quot;thousands and thousands&quot; of people dying as part of a smoke and mirrors game to point out what&#039;s so wrong about the world - a distraction to cover up a lack of confidence in themselves and perhaps a feeling that &lt;em&gt;their&lt;/em&gt; life has no active meaning, a sense of helplessness.  They feel helpless, therefore the world must be wrong.

The commenter accepts that the point they&#039;ve perceived me as making is &quot;true&quot;, but for some reason, in their mind, the validity of that point is dependent entirely upon this circumstance of &quot;thousands and thousands&quot; dying, that they themselves made up.  So did they really understand the point that they called &quot;true&quot;? Of course not; they go on to call the whole blog &quot;nonsensical&quot;. Not because it&#039;s nonsense mind you, but simply because they did not understand the point that they pretended to understand at the beginning of their comment.

This commenter would fit right in with Khāmene’i&#039;s Iran - reactionary (and therefore powerless), ignorant, exaggerative and fearful.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Thousands and thousands&#8221; this commenter says. Well let&#8217;s do the math on that. &#8220;Thousands&#8221; is plural so that equals at least 2 thousand. So by this commenter&#8217;s account, at least 4 thousand people have died, specifically &#8220;in the streets&#8221;. None of them are dying indoors like civilized cunts. And I guess the only way for the commenter to actually know this as a fact is that he or she is there, in the streets of Tehran, counting people as they die. How else could the commenter possible know these &#8216;facts&#8217;?</p>
<p>Of course they do not know these facts. They believe these facts. Which makes them opinions, not facts. Further shown by the commenter providing absolutely no reference for the statement that he or she represents as fact.  They&#8217;ve decided themselves that there must be &#8220;thousands and thousands&#8221; of people dying as part of a smoke and mirrors game to point out what&#8217;s so wrong about the world &#8211; a distraction to cover up a lack of confidence in themselves and perhaps a feeling that <em>their</em> life has no active meaning, a sense of helplessness.  They feel helpless, therefore the world must be wrong.</p>
<p>The commenter accepts that the point they&#8217;ve perceived me as making is &#8220;true&#8221;, but for some reason, in their mind, the validity of that point is dependent entirely upon this circumstance of &#8220;thousands and thousands&#8221; dying, that they themselves made up.  So did they really understand the point that they called &#8220;true&#8221;? Of course not; they go on to call the whole blog &#8220;nonsensical&#8221;. Not because it&#8217;s nonsense mind you, but simply because they did not understand the point that they pretended to understand at the beginning of their comment.</p>
<p>This commenter would fit right in with Khāmene’i&#8217;s Iran &#8211; reactionary (and therefore powerless), ignorant, exaggerative and fearful.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: zx</title>
		<link>http://sifr4.com/blog/2009/06/20/and-all-the-ayatollahs-men-couldnt-put-him-back-together-again/comment-page-1/#comment-62</link>
		<dc:creator>zx</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 20:33:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sifr4.com/blog/?p=174#comment-62</guid>
		<description>- the Supreme Leader of Iran has abdicated all power. the wielder of a gun has no power if they cannot take responsibility for (i.e. control) their weapon. Eventually, they will shoot themselves in the face.

True, except you&#039;ve made your point while thousands and thousands die in the streets.  

Pure nonsensical blog dude</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>- the Supreme Leader of Iran has abdicated all power. the wielder of a gun has no power if they cannot take responsibility for (i.e. control) their weapon. Eventually, they will shoot themselves in the face.</p>
<p>True, except you&#8217;ve made your point while thousands and thousands die in the streets.  </p>
<p>Pure nonsensical blog dude</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

